28.2.10

Beckett Seminar: May 2010


Beckett Seminar
The Twentieth Anniversary Session (1990-2010)
8 May 2010

The Beckett International Foundation at the University of Reading

The event will be held in the Conference Room of Special Collections at the University of Reading.

As in previous years, our speakers represent a mixture of both local and international research students as well as established scholars, reflecting the current research into Beckett's writing. It is our hope that the quality of the papers will, as in the past, attract a wide and varied audience.

Date: Saturday, 8 May 2010
Time: 10.00 to 17.00
Venue: Conference Room, Special Collections, The University of Reading

10.00 - 10.30 Coffee
10.30 - 11.00 Thomas Cousineau, Washington College
‘Symmetry Unbound: Samuel Beckett’s Modernist Rage for Order’
11.00 - 11.30 Discussion
11.30 - 12.00 Gaby Hartel, Berlin
‘listen to the light now - Samuel Beckett’s artistic
transformation of early radio theories’
12.00 - 12.30 Discussion
12.30 - 14.00 Lunch
14.00 - 14.30 Tatyana Hramova, University of Reading
‘Forma moriendi causa nasciendi est: The Dichotomy
Mortality/Immortality in the Names of Samuel Beckett’s Characters’
14.30 - 15.00 Discussion
15.00 - 15.30 Jean-Michel Rabaté, University of Pennsylviania
‘Think, Pig! Beckett’s animal philosophy’
15.30 - 16.00 Discussion
16.00 - 16.45 Wine Reception – 20 Years BIF Research Seminar

For further information, please contact:

Dr Mark Nixon
E: m.nixon@reading.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0) 118 378 7010

By Post: The Beckett International Foundation
Department of English, University of Reading, Whiteknights
PO Box 218, Reading RG6 6AA

My thanks to Dr Mark Nixon for this bulletin.

Beckett, Joyce and Irish Exile

Sean O'Hagan on the role that exile plays in Irish cultural and political life
Samuel Beckett in exile in Paris, 1986. Photograph: Bob Adelman/Corbis
When Mary Robinson became president of Ireland in 1990, one of her first, and most symbolic, actions was to light a lamp in the kitchen window of her official residence to acknowledge the many millions of Irish people overseas. Until then, Irish emigration had been one of the great unspokens of political life, while simultaneously being one of the great themes of Irish drama, fiction and poetry.

Robinson's inspiration was a poem by Eavan Boland called The Emigrant Irish. "Like oil lamps," it begins, "we put them out the back – of our houses, of our minds." The generations who left for a new life in Britain and America haunted Irish writing and song throughout the 20th century.

Both James Joyce and Samuel Beckett, the two towering modernists of Irish literature, chose exile, the former famously describing Ireland as 'the old sow that eats her farrow". Joyce also wrote that the Irishman was more respected abroad; "the economic and intellectual contradictions that prevail in his own country do not allow the development of individuality".

It was Beckett who gave voice to the exile's dilemma of not belonging. "It is suicide to be abroad," says a character in All That Fall, "but what is it to be at home?… A lingering dissolution." [Read the article]

Also at A Piece of Monologue:

Disjecta: This week's links


This week, we see connections between Don DeLillo's work and AMC's period drama, Mad Men. Joyce Carol Oates recalls growing up in Lockport, and reflects on the way childhood memory has influenced her writing. While 3 Quarks Daily announces its annual Arts and Literature blog competition, to be judged by poet Robert Pinsky. In other news, the first issue of online academic journal Assuming Gender is now online: all articles and reviews are freely downloadable. Neil Badmington reflects on the continued importance of Barthes Mythologies, now expanded with new material and a new introduction. And the incomparable Stewart Lee signs a book deal with Faber & Faber, aiming to publish an annotated edition of his stand-up material. It's been an exciting week! Enjoy the links.

Literature:

Don DeLillo: On DeLillo's influence on popular culture, focussing on Mad Men
Don DeLillo: Point Omega featured in the New Yorker's 'Briefly Noted'
Don DeLillo: One-hour audio discussion on White Noise
Don DeLillo: The Quarterly Conversation reviews Point Omega
W. G. Sebald: This Space on Will Self and Sebald
Martin Amis: Anthony Cummins criticizes Amis' comments about J. M. Coetzee
Samuel Beckett: Don DeLillo on Beckett and contemporary fiction
Samuel Beckett: Beckett's poem, Cascando
Samuel Beckett: Richard Crary on Beckett and Marcel Proust
Joyce Carol Oates: Oates recalls growing up in Lockport, New York
Franz Kafka: Philip Roth on Kafka and the Holocaust
William S. Burroughs: RealityStudio on 'The Blade Runner' and 'The Shootist'
J. G. Ballard: Writer Nicholas Royle on Ballard's work
James Joyce: Audio recording of Joyce reading Finnegans Wake
Lucia Joyce: The Guardian on James Joyce's daughter, friend of Samuel Beckett
Fyodor Dostoyevsky: Saul Bellow on Dostoyevsky and Paris
Jonathan Lethem: Lee Rourke interviews Lethem in the New Statesman
3 Quarks Daily Prize in Arts and Literature: Submit your favourite blogposts
Newspapers/Blogs: Columnist and blogger Mark Athitakis on the pros and cons
E-Books: Thousands of authors opt-out of Google settlement

Philosophy & Critical Theory:

Assuming Gender: First issue of the free academic journal now online
Slavoj Žižek: Public Lecture at Cardiff University, 3 March 2010
Slavoj Žižek: New issue of the International Journal of Žižek Studies now available
René Descartes: Stolen letter to be returned
Roland Barthes: Barthes scholar Neil Badmington on the expanded Mythologies
Jacques Derrida: Mark Thwaite on Derrida, Shields and Capitalist Realism
Simon Critchley: The Big Think interviews the British philosopher
Alain Badiou: An interview 'on evil'

Film:

Terrence Malick: New film announcement, The Tree of Life starring Brad Pitt
Terrence Malick: Simon Critchley on 'calm' in The Thin Red Line
Werner Herzog: Herzog's three films a year
Samuel Beckett: Simon Critchley on Beckett's Film

Theatre:

William Shakespeare: Mark Thwaite's essay, 'King Lear, madness and my grandmother'
Samuel Beckett: Anna McMullan's Performing Embodiment in Samuel Beckett's Drama

Music:

Iggy Pop: Pop discusses the writing process in a late '70s television interview

Television:

David Simon: An interview with the creator of The Wire about new series, Treme

Etc.:

Will Self: On conspiracy theories
Stewart Lee: Faber signs Stewart Lee for annotated transcriptions of stand-up material

Thank you to all link contributors, who can be found on the A Piece of Monologue Twitter page.
27.2.10

Don DeLillo on Samuel Beckett

American writer discusses the influence of Beckett's work
Don DeLillo on Samuel Beckett

Christian Moraru reviews David Cowart's Don DeLillo: the Physics of Language, and makes a note of the influence of Samuel Beckett in DeLillo's work.
In Don DeLillo's 1991 novel, Mao II, a character—a dark visionary—offers that "Beckett is the last writer to shape the way we think and see. After him, the major work involves midair explosions and crumbled buildings. This is the new tragic narrative". At a reading DeLillo gave on the Duke University campus in April 2002, I asked him to elaborate on Beckett's role in Mao II. Beckett was, DeLillo told his audience, among the last to have built a universe—Beckett's "world"—in which his readers could be said to "live." In the post-Beckett era, Mao II further suggests, it is the other way around: writers are somehow sucked into the world surrounding theirs. After Beckett, "the artist is absorbed." Just the terrorist remains "outside," for "the culture hasn't figured out how to assimilate him." And, surprisingly or not, it is the novelist who sees that terrorism speaks "precisely the language of being noticed, the only language the West understands". Whether DeLillo is to postmodern America what Beckett was to late modernity matters less here. What I do want to stress is that DeLillo's language stands out, forces us to take notice. It is not merely a representation vehicle. Rather than a vehicle, his language is a theme and an ontological force that projects worlds and identities. It is of crucial importance in his work, and Cowart argues eloquently for this centrality, zeroing in on "DeLillo's career-long exploration of language as cultural index, as 'deepest being,' as numinosum". [Read more]

[In] contemporary writing in general, there's a strong sense that the world of Beckett and Kafka has redescended on contemporary America, because characters seem to live in a theoretical environment rather than a real one. I haven't felt I'm a part of that. I've always had a grounding in the real world, whatever esoteric flights I might indulge in from time to time.

Don DeLillo
quoted in Anthony DeCurtis, '"An Outsider in Society": An Interview with Don DeLillo'
Conversations with Don DeLillo
Beckett is a master of language. He is all language. Out of the words come the people instead of the other way around. He is the last writer whose work extends into the world so that (as with Kafka before him) we can see or hear something and identify it as an expression of Beckett beyond the book or stage.

Don DeLillo
quoted by Gary Adelman in 'Beckett's Readers: A Commentary and Symposium'
Michigan Quarterly Review, Winter 2004
Also at A Piece of Monologue:
26.2.10

The Big Think Interviews Simon Critchley

A selection of clips on a variety of topics

The Big Think has interviewed British philosopher Simon Critchley on a number of topics, from teaching, politics, and history to death, longevity and optimism. Each clip weighs in at approximate 3-5 minutes, although one or two offer extended discussion. Well worth a look for fans of Critchley's views, or perhaps if you're curious about philosophy's place in everyday life:
  1. Simon Critchley on the Best Philosopher Deaths
  2. Simon Critchley on Teaching
  3. Simon Critchley Philosophizes The Obama Moment
  4. Simon Critchley on Optimism
  5. Simon Critchley Examines Friedrich Nietzsche
  6. Simon Critchley on Living Like a Philosopher
  7. Simon Critchley on the Psychology of Murder
  8. Simon Critchley on the Desire of Longevity
  9. Simon Critchley on Religion and Death
  10. Simon Critchley on the History of Death

Also at A Piece of Monologue:
25.2.10

Badmington on Roland Barthes and Mythologies

Barthes scholar takes another look at a classic collection of essays

A new expanded edition of Roland Barthes' Mythologies has recently been published by Vintage. It includes material never previously published in English, and a brand new introduction by Barthes scholar Neil Badmington, editor of a four-volume collection of the French thinker's work. In today's Times Higher Education, Badmington explains just what Barthes means by 'mythology', and how the term is essential for a contemporary understanding of the culture that surrounds us:
Why is the Church like margarine?

This sounds like the beginning of a bad joke, but is actually one of the questions addressed in Roland Barthes' Mythologies, which first appeared in 1957. Inspired by Ferdinand de Saussure's proposition that meaning is culturally determined and that the discipline of semiology would one day exist, Barthes examines how a range of everyday objects, values and rituals signify in French culture. The subject matter shifts considerably from chapter to chapter: food, hairstyles, horoscopes, detergents, Martians, religion, toys, photography, plastic and advertising are among the many targets. But through the eclecticism rings a repeated denunciation of "myth", or the transformation of the historically specific values of the ruling class into naturalised, eternal, universal truths. "I resented", Barthes wrote, "seeing Nature and History confused at every turn, and I wanted to track down, in the decorative display of what-goes-without-saying, the ideological abuse which, in my view, is hidden there." [Read the article]

Also at A Piece of Monologue:
24.2.10

Critchley on Samuel Beckett's Film

British philosopher discusses Beckett's only motion picture
Buster Keaton stars in Samuel Beckett's 'Film'

British philosopher Simon Critchley takes a closer look at Samuel Beckett's Film:
Samuel Beckett wrote just once for the cinema. Film was written in 1963 and first shown publicly in 1965, forty years ago (Beckett 1986, 321-334). Film was shot in New York in 1964, with the opening external shots in Lower Manhattan close to Brooklyn Bridge and the rest in Greenwich Village, and it was the occasion of Beckett’s one and only trip to the United States. The movie was the idea of Barney Rosset, Beckett’s New York publisher and legendary editor of the Grove Press in its long heyday from the 1950s to the 70s. Film was the movie debut of Alan Schneider, Beckett’s most trusted, long-serving and long-suffering theatre director in the United States. It stars Buster Keaton in his one of his last movie appearances – he made several B-movie beach movies before his death in February 1966. Beckett said of Keaton that ‘he had a poker mind as well as a poker face’ and their relationship did not get off to a good start. Schneider tells a story of their first meeting in Keaton’s hotel room, where Beckett awkwardly tried to engage in conversation with Keaton while the latter replied in monosyllables, drank a beer and watched the baseball game on TV. Beckett was a huge sports fan and considerable sportsman himself – the only winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature to be mentioned in Wisden’s Cricketers’ Almanack, playing first-class cricket for Trinity College Dublin – and went to see the New York Mets at Shea Stadium during his trip to New York and apparently thoroughly enjoyed the game. A little sadly perhaps, Keaton was the fourth choice for the role, behind Charlie Chaplin, Jack MacGowran and Zero Mostel. That said, Keaton is excellently cast and his entire physical presence, in particular the extraordinary face with which the movie finishes, seems to carry the entire tragi-comedy of Film. Ask yourself: what is sadder than the face of an aging comedian? We somehow expect a comic’s face to be eternally frozen in their glory days; think of the late movies of Laurel and Hardy or The Marx Brothers, where youthful elasticity and energy has given way to wrinkles and clichéd, plodding self-parody. [...]
Samuel Beckett stands on the set of 'Film'
There is something oddly and deliberately anachronistic about the period in which Film is set. Beckett laconically and typically remarks, ‘Period: about 1929. Early summer morning’(Beckett, 1986, p.324). What exactly does ‘about 1929’ mean? This is a typical Beckettian elision. Let’s not forget that 1929 was quite a year, with the first presentation of the Academy Awards (Keaton’s 1929 movie, which didn’t win any prizes, was ‘Spite Marriage’), and in October there was a little something down the road from the setting of Film called the Wall Street Crash. Yet, as readers of Beckett will know, many of his novels and plays are set in a comically unreal period between the wars, a world full of bicycles, bowler hats, dark suits, and whimsically anachronistic technology. The other salient feature about the period in which Film is set is that it is silent; well, almost silent apart from a ‘sssh’ in the opening scene. In the original project for Film, Beckett notes, ‘Climate of Film comic and unreal’; and he adds that the Keaton character, ‘should invite laughter throughout by his way of moving’. Is Film funny? It is certainly not very funny and one does not exactly fall about laughing watching it. As one of Beckett’s characters in the Trilogy remarks, ‘Nothing is funnier than unhappiness, I’ll grant you that’. We would do well to keep those words in mind as we watch Film. [Read the essay]

Also at A Piece of Monologue:
23.2.10

Critchley on Nature in Terrence Malick

Simon Critchley discusses one of the pervasive themes in the director's work
Terrence Malick's 'The Thin Red Line' (1998)

From an essay on American war film The Thin Red Line, Simon Critchley's explores themes of nature in  the work of filmmaker Terrence Malick:
Why do I claim that calm is the key to Malick's art? To try and tease this out, I would like to turn to the theme of nature, whose massive presence is the constant backdrop to Malick's movies. If calm in the face of mortality is the frame for the human drama of The Thin Red Line, then nature is the frame for this frame, a power that at times completely overshadows the human drama.

The Thin Red Line opens with the image of a huge crocodile slowly submerging into a weed-covered pond -- the crocodile who makes a brief return appearance towards the end of the film, when he is shown captured by some men from Charlie company, who prod it abstractedly with a stick. Against images of jungle trees densely wrapped in suffocating vines, we hear the first words of the movie, presumably spoken by Witt,

'What's this war in the heart of nature? Why does nature vie with itself, the land contend with the sea? Is there an avenging power in nature? Not one power, but two.' [...]
Terrence Malick's 'The Thin Red Line' (1998)
Obviously, the war in the heart of nature has a double meaning, suggesting both a war internal to nature, and the human war that is being fought out amid such immense natural beauty. These two meanings are brought together later in the film by Colonel Tall, when he is in the process of dismissing Starros from his commission and justifying the brutality of war,

'Look at this jungle, look at those vines, the way they twine around the tress, swallowing everything. Nature is cruel, Starros.'

Images of trees wrapped in vines punctuate The Thin Red Line, together with countless images of birds, in particular owls and parrots. These images are combined with the almost constant presence of natural sounds, of birdsong, of the wind in the Kunai grass, of animals moving in the undergrowth and the sound of water, both waves lapping on the beach and the flowing of the river.

Nature might be viewed as a kind of *fatum* for Malick, an ineluctable power, a warring force that both frames human war but is utterly indifferent to human purposes and intentions. This beautiful indifference of nature can be linked to the depiction of nature elsewhere in Malick's work. For example, Badlands is teeming with natural sounds and images: with birds, dogs, flowing water, the vast flatness of South Dakota, and the badlands of Montana, with its mountains in the distance -- and always remaining in the distance. Days of Heaven is also heavily marked with natural sounds and exquisitely photographed images, with flowing river water, the wind moving in fields of ripening wheat and silhouetted human figures working in vast fields. Nature also possesses here an avenging power, when a plague of locusts descend on the fields and Sam Shepherd sets fire to an entire wheat-crop -- Nature is indeed cruel. [...]
Terrence Malick's 'The Thin Red Line' (1998)
Although it is difficult not to grant that nature is playing a symbolic role for Malick, his is not an animistic conception of nature, of the kind that one finds lamented in Coleridge's 1802 'Dejection: An Ode': 'Oh Lady! We receive but what we give/And in our life alone does nature live'. Rather, in my opinion, nature's indifference to human purposes follows on from a broadly naturalistic conception of nature. Things are not enchanted in Malick's universe, they simply *are*, and we are things too. They are remote from us and continue on regardless of our strivings. This is what is suggested by the Wallace Stevens poem cited in epigraph to this essay. A soldier falls in battle, but his death does not invite pomp or transient glory. Rather, death has an absolute character, which Stevens likens to a moment in autumn when the wind stops. Yet, when the wind stops, above in the high heavens the clouds continue on their course, 'nevertheless,/In their direction'. What is central to Malick, I think, is this 'neverthelessness' of nature, of the fact that human death is absorbed into the relentlessness of nature, the eternal war in nature into which the death of a soldier is indifferently ingested. That's where Witt's spark lies.

There is a calm at the heart of Malick's art, a calmness to his cinematic eye, a calmness that is also communicated by his films, that becomes the mood of his audience. As Charlie company leave Guadalcanal and are taken back to their ship on a landing craft, we hear the final voiceover from Witt, this time from beyond the grave,

'Oh my soul, let me be in you now. Look out through my eyes, look out at the things you made, all things shining.' [...]
Terrence Malick's 'The Thin Red Line' (1998)
In each of his movies, one has the sense of things simply being looked at, just being what they are -- trees, water, birds, dogs, crocodiles, or whatever. Things simply are, and are not moulded to a human purpose. We watch things shining calmly, being as they are, in all the intricate evasions of 'as'. The camera can be pointed at those things to try and capture some grain or affluence of their reality. The closing shot of The Thin Red Line presents the viewer with a coconut fallen onto the beach, against which a little water laps, and out of which has sprouted a long green shoot, connoting life, one imagines. The coconut simply is, it merely lies there remote from us and our intentions. This suggests to me Stevens's final poem, 'The Palm at the End of the Mind', the palm that simply persists regardless of the makings of 'human meaning'. Stevens concludes: 'The palm stands on the edge of space. The wind moves slowly in its branches'. In my fancy at least, I see Malick concurring with this sentiment. [Read the essay]

Also at A Piece of Monologue:

Philip Roth on Kafka and the Holocaust

Jewish novelist discusses the implications of Franz Kafka surviving his early illness
Philip Roth reflects on the elusive writer Franz Kafka, and imagines what of his work would remain had he survived tuberculosis and lived through the Second World War:
I am looking, as I write of Kafka, at the photograph taken of him at the age of forty (my age)—it is 1924, as sweet and hopeful a year as he may ever have known as a man, and the year of his death.His face is sharp and skeletal, a burrower’s face:pronounced cheekbones made even more conspicuous by the absence of sideburns; the ears shaped and angled on his head like angel wings; an intense, creaturely gaze of startled composure—enormous fears, enormous control; a black towel of Levantine hair pulled close around the skull the only sensuous feature; there is a familiar Jewish flare in the bridge of the nose, the nose itself is long and weighted slightly at the tip—the nose of half the Jewish boys who were my friends in high school. Skulls chiseled like this one were shoveled by the thousands from the ovens; had he lived, his would have been among them, along with the skulls of his three younger sisters.

Of course, it is no more horrifying to think of Franz Kafka in Auschwitz than to think of anyone in Auschwitz—it is just horrifying in its own way. But he died too soon for the holocaust. Had he lived, perhaps he would have escaped with his good friend Max Brod, who found refuge in Palestine, a citizen of Israel until his death there in 1968. But Kafka escaping? It seems unlikely for one so fascinated by entrapment and careers that culminate in anguished death. Still, there is Karl Rossmann, his American greenhorn. Having imagined Karl’s escape to America and his mixed luck here, could not Kafka have found a way to execute an escape for himself? The New School for Social Research in New York becoming his Great Nature Theatre of Oklahoma? Or perhaps, through the influence of Thomas Mann, a position in the German department at Princeton … But then, had Kafka lived, it is not at all certain that the books of his which Mann celebrated from his refuge in New Jersey would ever have been published; eventually Kafka might either have destroyed those manuscripts that he had once bid Max Brod to dispose of at his death or, at the least, continued to keep them his secret.The Jewish refugee arriving in America in 1938 would not then have been Mann’s “religious humorist” but a frail and bookish fifty-five-year-old bachelor, formerly a lawyer for a government insurance firm in Prague, retired on a pension in Berlin at the time of Hitler’s rise to power—an author, yes, but of a few eccentric stories, mostly about animals, stories no one in America had ever heard of and only a handful in Europe had read; a homeless K., but without K.’s willfulness and purpose, a homeless Karl, but without Karl’s youthful spirit and resilience; just a Jew lucky enough to have escaped with his life, in his possession a suitcase containing some clothes, some family photos, some Prague mementos, and the manuscripts, still unpublished and in pieces, of Amerika, The Trial, The Castle, and (stranger things happen) three more fragmented novels, no less remarkable than the bizarre masterworks that he keeps to himself out of oedipal timidity, perfectionist madness, and insatiable longings for solitude and spiritual purity.

Philip Roth, '"I Always Wanted You to Admire My Fasting"; or, Looking at Kafka'
in Reading Myself and Others
Also at A Piece of Monologue:
21.2.10

DeLillo on Mad Men and Writing

American writer shares his experiences working for an advertising agency
Falling Man in Mad Men

Anticipating the release of his new novel, Point Omega, The Sunday Times interviews Don DeLillo about his life and work, exploring some the American author's 'writing tics', and making note of his contemporary relevance.

The article mentions AMC's period drama Mad Men, and it's easy to see why it shares key thematic links with DeLillo's work. Set in a New York advertising firm in the early 1960s, the show explores the consumerist manufacture of American aspirations with a sharp and ironic detachment. It has skillfully addressed the Kennedy assassination in a media climate of Cold War anxiety, and includes a cast of characters struggling with personal neuroses and societal repression.

Whether intentional or not, links between DeLillo's work and Mad Men can be seen throughout the series. For me, perhaps the most unsettling parallel is also the most provocative: the uncanny image of a Falling Man in Mad Men's opening title sequence. On the surface, we see a figure suspended in a densely commercial urban landscape, evoking a playful, and slightly sinister, impression of the Sterling Cooper advertising agency. It acts as short-hand for disorientation and modern alienation.

But there is also a strong association with the imagery of DeLillo's 2007 novel, Falling Man, published two months before Mad Men aired. I would suggest that to many viewers, interpreting the image is impossible without reference to American tragedy. And so, if Mad Men shares some of the images and themes of DeLillo's work, perhaps we can assume it also shares some of its intentions. The Falling Man roots the series to the anxieties and concerns of its twenty-first century audience; and while Mad Men may offer an ironic and nostalgic commentary on the past, its true concerns lie with the present.
[...] What’s extraordinary about DeLillo’s fiction is how many of its concerns — his preoccupation with the Twin Towers and terrorist spectaculars, for example — have coalesced into painful reality. It’s also interesting to see how many of his more benign imaginings have seeped into the culture. There is, of course, the knowing stuff: the rock band Airborne Toxic Event, for instance, named themselves after the chemical cloud that forms the centrepiece of White Noise (DeLillo was sent a CD, but found it “a little mainstream” for his tastes). There is also a sense in which DeLillo’s best novels capture what will become appealing to us. In Underworld, for instance, there is a chapter describing an advertising executive named Charlie Wainwright, working on Madison Avenue in 1961, that is almost a word-for-word treatment of the television show Mad Men. “The married copywriters met their secretaries,” DeLillo writes, “or the secretaries of other writers, or the tall and lissome secretaries of account executives, white-shod and well-spoken, and went about their tender regimen of lunchtime love...”

DeLillo worked as a copywriter for Ogilvy & Mather in the 1960s. He hasn’t seen Mad Men, because he only watches “sports, documentaries and movies, never continuing series”. He will say: “It’s pretty interesting that a show about that era should become popular now” — a programme about the formation of the branded consumer universe. But that’s all he has to say on the matter.

DeLillo would prefer to talk about how he works. His writerly tics — particularly his habit of writing only one paragraph per page on his typewriter — are revealing. DeLillo says he began writing in this fashion when he was living in Greece in the 1970s, working on The Names. He saw that the Greek alphabet was not just a tool, but a work of art. By using only one sheet of paper per paragraph, he could see his work more clearly.

“The shapes of letters began to attract me,” he says.

“I began to notice the shapes of words and letters within words — not only the sound and the meaning it created, but the look of a particular set of words. A phrase like ‘the raw sprawl of the city’, which I used towards the end of Underworld — I see the word ‘raw’ inside the word ‘sprawl’ and I like this, it seems right. And I get a certain pleasure when that correspondence develops.”

This period, when writing The Names, was also when DeLillo “rededicated himself” to writing novels seriously. He began to rediscover the “great pleasure” he had in collecting material for his work. DeLillo has been dedicated ever since. He says he has had “the luckiest life” as a novelist, and has always been able to do “pretty much what I wanted”. And, despite the advance of technology and a dwindling serious readership, he continues to believe utterly in what he does.

Before he leaves, DeLillo makes an impassioned case for the continuing significance of the novel. “It is the form that allows a writer the greatest opportunity to explore human experience,” he says. “For that reason, reading a novel is potentially a significant act. Because there are so many varieties of human experience, so many kinds of interaction between humans, and so many ways of creating patterns in the novel that can’t be created in a short story, a play, a poem or a movie. The novel, simply, offers more opportunities for a reader to understand the world better, including the world of artistic creation. That sounds pretty grand, but I think it’s true.”

With that, he’s done. DeLillo has stopped wanting to talk about it. He is back to work, one paragraph at a time. [Read the article]

Also on A Piece of Monologue:

Disjecta: This week's links

Baskerville Italic: What's your typeface?

This week, new evidence comes to light suggesting that French philosopher René Descartes may have been poisoned. The Guardian reflects on the lost translations of Jorges Luis Borges. And Iain Sinclair discusses the lasting artistic legacy of J. G. Ballard. In addition, there are new interviews with eccentric Austrian filmmaker Werner Herzog, unseen photographs from Francis Bacon's studio, and an article by Will Self on British arts presenter Melvyn Bragg.

Literature:

J. G. Ballard: Iain Sinclair on Ballard's artistic legacy
Arthur Koestler: The Guardian profiles the troubled European novelist
J. D. Salinger: Evidence suggests Salinger wrote long after he stopped publishing
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe: The Goethe Walking Group
William Faulkner: On Faulkner's drinking habits
William S. Burroughs: Interviewed by The Paris Review
E-books: Why Charlie Brooker is an e-book convert
Jorge Luis Borges: The Guardian on Borges' lost translations
Best-Read Presidents of the United States
The Cult's Top Ten Books of 2009
Typo of the day for librarians

Philosophy & Critical Theory:

René Descartes: Was Descartes poisoned by a Catholic priest?
Simon Critchley: On the importance of critical theory to social movements
Judith Butler: On the importance of critical theory to social movements
Jacques Ranciere: On the importance of critical theory to social movements
Sigmund Freud: Hitler painting owned by Freud to be sold at auction
Boredom: Colin Bisset on boredom

Art:

Francis Bacon: Unseen images of wrestlers made in Bacon's studio
J. G. Ballard: BBC reports on art exhibition inspired by Ballard's work
J. G. Ballard: The Financial Times reviews Ballardian art exhibition
Fonts/Typefaces: Critical Cookie asks 'What's your type?'
Bauhaus: 1994 documentary, Bauhaus: The Face of the 20th Century

Film:

Werner Herzog: Sign and Sight interviews the Austrian filmmaker
Werner Herzog: Translated interview fragments published on Nomadics

Theatre:

Samuel Beckett: BFI Recommends Waiting for Godot at London's Haymarket Theatre
Samuel Beckett: Happy Days playbill from 1965, starring Madeleine Renaud, available from Ebay
Thomas Bernhard: Review of Bernhard's play, Heldenplatz

Etc.:

Will Self: On hotel breakfasts
Will Self: On Melvyn Bragg, the South Bank Show and In Our Time

Thank you to all link contributors, who can be found on the A Piece of Monologue Twitter page.
20.2.10

Ten Rules for Writing Fiction

Leading writers and critics offer their advice

The Guardian has helpfully distilled the wisdom of some of the world's most distinguished contemporary writers, and published a self-help guide to coax aspiring novelists to put pen to paper. The article, published in two parts, asked a diverse range of authors for their ten rules for writing fiction. Here are just a few that caught my eye:

Will Self:

Will Self1. Don't look back until you've written an entire draft, just begin each day from the last sentence you wrote the preceeding day. This prevents those cringing feelings, and means that you have a substantial body of work before you get down to the real work which is all in . . .

2. The edit.

3. Always carry a notebook. And I mean always. The short-term memory only retains information for three minutes; unless it is committed to paper you can lose an idea for ever.

4. Stop reading fiction – it's all lies anyway, and it doesn't have anything to tell you that you don't know already (assuming, that is, you've read a great deal of fiction in the past; if you haven't you have no business whatsoever being a writer of fiction).

5. You know that sickening feeling of inadequacy and over-exposure you feel when you look upon your own empurpled prose? Relax into the awareness that this ghastly sensation will never, ever leave you, no matter how successful and publicly lauded you become. It is intrinsic to the real business of writing and should be cherished.

6. Live life and write about life. Of the making of many books there is ­indeed no end, but there are more than enough books about books.

7. By the same token remember how much time people spend watching TV. If you're writing a novel with a contemporary setting there need to be long passages where nothing happens save for TV watching: "Later, George watched Grand Designs while eating HobNobs. Later still he watched the shopping channel for a while . . ."

8. The writing life is essentially one of solitary confinement – if you can't deal with this you needn't apply.

9. Oh, and not forgetting the occasional beating administered by the sadistic guards of the imagination.

10. Regard yourself as a small corporation of one. Take yourself off on team-building exercises (long walks). Hold a Christmas party every year at which you stand in the corner of your writing room, shouting very loudly to yourself while drinking a bottle of white wine. Then masturbate under the desk. The following day you will feel a deep and cohering sense of embarrassment.

Joyce Carol Oates:
    Joyce Carol Oates
1. Don't try to anticipate an "ideal reader" – there may be one, but he/she is reading someone else.

2. Don't try to anticipate an "ideal reader" – except for yourself perhaps, sometime in the future.

3. Be your own editor/critic. Sympathetic but merciless!

4. Unless you are writing something very avant-garde – all gnarled, snarled and "obscure" – be alert for possibilities of paragraphing.

5. Unless you are writing something very post-modernist – self-conscious, self-reflexive and "provocative" – be alert for possibilities of using plain familiar words in place of polysyllabic "big" words.

6. Keep in mind Oscar Wilde: "A little sincerity is a dangerous thing, and a great deal of it is absolutely fatal."

7. Keep a light, hopeful heart. But expect the worst.

Magaret Atwood:
    Margaret Atwood
1. Take a pencil to write with on aeroplanes. Pens leak. But if the pencil breaks, you can't sharpen it on the plane, because you can't take knives with you. Therefore: take two pencils.

2. If both pencils break, you can do a rough sharpening job with a nail file of the metal or glass type.

3. Take something to write on. Paper is good. In a pinch, pieces of wood or your arm will do.

4. If you're using a computer, always safeguard new text with a memory stick.

5. Do back exercises. Pain is distracting.

6. Hold the reader's attention. (This is likely to work better if you can hold your own.) But you don't know who the reader is, so it's like shooting fish with a slingshot in the dark. What fascinates A will bore the pants off B.

7. You most likely need a thesaurus, a rudimentary grammar book, and a grip on reality. This latter means: there's no free lunch. Writing is work. It's also gambling. You don't get a pension plan. Other people can help you a bit, but essentially you're on your own. Nobody is making you do this: you chose it, so don't whine.

8. You can never read your own book with the innocent anticipation that comes with that first delicious page of a new book, because you wrote the thing. You've been backstage. You've seen how the rabbits were smuggled into the hat. Therefore ask a reading friend or two to look at it before you give it to anyone in the publishing business. This friend should not be someone with whom you have a romantic relationship, unless you want to break up.

9. Don't sit down in the middle of the woods. If you're lost in the plot or blocked, retrace your steps to where you went wrong. Then take the other road. And/or change the person. Change the tense. Change the opening page.

10. Prayer might work. Or reading something else. Or a constant visual­isation of the holy grail that is the finished, published version of your resplendent book.

Read more:
From The Guardian, 20 February 2010:
  • 'Ten rules for writing fiction', part 1: Elmore Leonard, Diana Athill, Margaret Atwood, Roddy Doyle, Helen Dunmore, Geoff Dyer, Anne Enright, Richard Ford, Jonathan Franzen, Esther Freud, Neil Gaiman, David Hare, PD James, AL Kennedy
  • 'Ten rules for writing fiction', part 2: Hilary Mantel, Michael Moorcock, Michael Morpurgo, Andrew Motion, Joyce Carol Oates, Annie Proulx, Philip Pullman, Ian Rankin, Will Self, Helen Simpson, Zadie Smith, Colm Tóibín, Rose Tremain, Sarah Waters, Jeanette Winterson
19.2.10

Clarice Lispector: Cult Hero

Clarice Lispector

3:AM Magazine lists Clarice Lispector as a 3:AM Cult Hero. British writer Lee Rourke reflects on Lispector's characteristic silences:
[...] But silence? What is this silence within The Hour of the Star? In Rodrigo S.M.’s narration? In Clarice Lispector’s writing itself? Clarice Lispector once proclaimed The Hour of the Star as a book made without words. Lispector’s silence is Macabéa’s sorrow, and just because we never hear it, this doesn’t mean that it’s not there throughout. It is Macabéa’s bona fide voice; and this silence in The Hour of the Star is the power of Clarice Lispector as a writer: knowing just what to leave out. [Read more]

18.2.10

Michael Haneke: cinema's serious man

The Guardian newspaper's Jonathan Jones on Austrian filmmaker, Michael Haneke
Michael Haneke. Photograph: Nicolas Guerin/Corbis
Haneke has put European cinema back into the premier league (I won't say singlehandedly, because frankly the Eurozone seems to be teeming with gifted directors in a way that it hasn't been since the 1970s), but while others are promising, he is unquestionably in the same class as Antonioni, Fassbinder, or Godard. His films are classics: they are perfect and they are profound.

I wrote about Haneke briefly a few weeks ago, but what I want to do here is urge anyone who hasn't seen his film Code Unknown (2000) to do so immediately. Well, perhaps not immediately. You might want to wait until you feel up to a disturbing, unresolved, anxiety-inducing, guilt-ridden confrontation with the moral emptiness of the globalised world, or the impossibility of communication, or the imperative to act in a world where action is probably a mistake.

But it's such an intellectually and aesthetically rewarding film; it's like waking up to find the golden age of cinema has come back, but in modern clothes. It is one of those films, such as Short Cuts and Magnolia, that capture the feel of contemporary life in a series of interweaving stories. But it is the best of such films that I have ever seen. Haneke has taught at film school, and often in his films you have the sense of a subversive masterclass. In this film he is deconstructing all those cool, fragmentary art movies, and showing how it should be done. [Read the article]

More at A Piece of Monologue:
17.2.10

Don DeLillo on Modern Death

An excerpt from the novel, White Noise
Photograph by romanlily on Flickr.com

Murray Jay Siskind, a character from Don DeLillo's White Noise, ruminates on changing attitudes toward death and dying:
“‘This is the nature of modern death,’ Murray said. ‘It has a life independent of us. It is growing in prestige and dimension. It has a sweep it never had before. We study it objectively. We can predict its appearance, trace its path in the body. We can take cross-section pictures of it, tape its tremors and waves. We’ve never been so close to it, so familiar with its habits and attitudes. We know it intimately. But it continues to grow, to acquire breadth and scope, new outlets, new passages and means. The more we learn, the more it grows, Is this some law of physics? Every advance in knowledge and technique is matched by a new kind of death, a new strain. Death adapts, like a viral agent. Is it a law of nature? Or some private superstition of mine? I sense that the dead are closer to us than ever. I sense that we inhabit the same air as the dead. Remember Lao Tse. “There is no difference between the quick and the dead. They are one channel of vitality.” He said this six hundred years before Christ. It is true once again, perhaps more true than ever.’”

Don DeLillo, White Noise
Also at A Piece of Monologue:
16.2.10

Taxi Driver to be remade?

Martin Scorsese's landmark film to be re-imagined for the present-day

Yesterday, I mentioned some of the characteristic themes of Don DeLillo's fiction, ranging from commercialism, media representation and catastrophe in American culture. For fans of Martin Scorsese's Taxi Driver, these motifs are all-too-familiar. The film addresses all of these themes to a greater or lesser degree, and presents them as symbols of a culture in decline. Robert DeNiro's performance became a signature trademark of urban alienation and threatened masculinity, as a dislocated protagonist attempts to navigate the disorientating streets of late 1970s New York.

Travis Bickle, a full-time taxi driver, becomes increasingly disconnected from his surroundings, and begins to imagine moral and political codes as corrupted by a malevolent modernity. Bickle's fragile relationship with reality shifts and splinters as he fantasizes about moral salvation. He imagines himself as the assassin of a presidential candidate, or a cinematic archetype of brutal vigilantism. The films ends appropriately as an ironic comment on the very idea of the hero, a figure constructed by traditional moral codes that operates through violence and social paranoia.

With this in mind, it's interesting to hear rumours of a possible remake or re-imagining of Scorsese's landmark film. Some might argue that the last ten years have been characterized by media paranoia and reactionary politics, fertile ground for a new Travis Bickle. A new adaptation could update this marginal figure for the twenty-first century, a place to inscribe cultural fears and anxieties. In short, someone troubled and confused, with dreams of salvation in his head (link via Ballardian):
In what is surely the most bizarre rumour to emerge from this year's Berlin film festival, it is whispered that Martin Scorsese and Robert De Niro are preparing a remake of Taxi Driver, their 1970s tale of a man who stood up, saw clearly and shaved his hair into a mohawk. Only this time, it transpires, they may have a fresh passenger on board – Lars von Trier could be riding shotgun.

Copenhagen film magazine Ekko reports that Scorsese is currently discussing the possibility of a rebooted Taxi Driver with the Danish director in tow. It remains to be seen whether this will be a remake or a sequel, or so much hot air of the kind that has a tendency to swirl around the mischievous Von Trier. Speaking to the magazine, Peter Aalbæk, Von Trier's producing partner at Zentropa studios, would "neither confirm nor deny" the rumour, but said that an announcement would be made shortly. [Read the article]

15.2.10

Don DeLillo, White Noise

On a contemporary American masterpiece
Don DeLillo, 'White Noise'
Don DeLillo, White Noise
You might be forgiven for considering Don DeLillo’s White Noise as a survival manual for contemporary life. Now celebrating its 25th anniversary, the novel’s relevance continues as a philosophical checklist of twenty-first century culture. On its initial release in 1985, DeLillo’s novel stood out for its wry commentary on the ubiquity of commercialism — ‘Mastercard, Visa, American Express’ — and its portrayal of neurotic anxiety at the heart of the Western nuclear family. The novel inaugurated a new phase in the American writer’s career, sparking a series of bold and ambitious books that includes Libra, Mao II and Underworld. But, for me, White Noise remains DeLillo’s signature work.

What strikes most readers about the novel is its unique narrative voice, a tone of ironic detachment that evokes everyday scenes with cutting insight. White Noise is a rare breed, skillfully presenting weighty themes and complex ideas with a playful humour and a lightness of touch: whether in its uncanny portrayal of domestic routine, or for its disquieting revelations of characters’ deep-rooted anxieties.

The narrative of White Noise feels both modern and strangely timeless: Jack Gladney, chairman of the department of Hitler studies at a North-American university, struggles to reconcile himself with the inevitability of his own death. It is one of the eternal dilemmas of Western literature, but cast in terms of cultural obsession and commodification. Gladney’s philosophical struggle (or cold and simple fear, however you want to look at it) is contextualized by trips to supermarkets, airports and motels. The novel seems to encompass everything, from tabloid sensationalism, to chemical disaster, to the ethics of searching someone’s garbage. The commonplace is invested with a sense of the surreal and the absurd, as Gladney attempts to justify his life and establish a meaning, or truth, to his existence.

White Noise is fascinated by the literal and metaphysical infrastructures of Western society - its architectural ground-plan, and its psychological effects. From the ubiquity of the ‘universally-pronounceable’ brand name, the mass-produced bumper sticker as a marker of individual expression, or the perverse dream logic of the Hollywood movie. White Noise is drawn to themes of commercialism, media representation, and societal collapse, ‘the dark side of consumer consciousness’. It examines memory and nostalgia with a postmodern twinkle in its eye, perhaps as little more than commodities found on a supermarket shelf. One character asks whether it is possible to feel homesick for a place even when you are there: this is the world White Noise evokes.

Like J. G. Ballard, who saw a death of affect in the press fascination with the Kennedy Assassination, DeLillo critiques our place in a world of increasingly fragmented and unstable media realities. With an ironic nod to news sensationalism, DeLillo adopts apocalyptic motifs to chronicle our everyday: surveying the Western family through a lens of cultural disaster and individual struggle. Twenty-five years since its initial publication, White Noise feels like an important and ongoing philosophical experiment, where, for the first time, the writer imagines what it really means to die in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Panasonic.

Published in The Spectator Book Blog.

Also at A Piece of Monologue:

Billie Whitelaw on Beckett and Play

Samuel Beckett's favourite actress recalls meeting the playwright for the first time
Billie Whitelaw in Samuel Beckett's 'Play'

In an autobiography that chronicles twenty-five years as Samuel Beckett's favourite actress, Billie Whitelaw remembers meeting the Irish playwright for the first time:
What happened next went like this, but I have to say that I'm taking more than a little poetic licence in reconstructing this event. George Devine had a friend in Paris, a fairly bizarre writer called Samuel Beckett. A play of his had just opened in Germany which had parts for two women and one man. The perfect substitute! George quickly got in touch with Beckett, who agreed to translate Play into English. And so some time later I was presented with this short, extraordinary piece. I went home to read it. My first thought was: what the hell am I going to do with this? My second thought: what a pity the Lope de Vega play fell through. I had no idea what Play meant. On paper t seemed to be about a man, his wife and his mistress, all of whom were stuck in urns. Somehow I felt the story wasn't all that important. What mattered was the way the story was presented.

At this time I'd hardly heard of Samuel Beckett. All I knew about him was that Brenda Bruce had done a strange play of his [Happy Days], in which she was buried up to her neck in earth. And I hadn't even seen that, only photographs. I read Play again. My reaction was now: don't worry if you don't understand it, but do it fast. [...]

None of Beckett's plays I did later had much to do with normal characterisation or psychology. To me, they have all been hooks on which to hang a specific human condition. They are not plays about anything, they represent emotional states of mind. In the case of Play it was the mind exploding in chaos and confusion - often expressed with humour. This I could understand only too well. In my own life I have often had rows going on in my head, yet when I've met the person I've wanted to row with, I've said nothing but: 'Oh well.' The rage has gone round and round in my head and repeated itself long after the confrontation. That seemed to me the point of Play - three people, all of them caught up in a loop of emotion, going over this emotion over and over again.
Billie Whitelaw in Samuel Beckett's 'Play'
What struck me was that whereas most writers would have written a three- or four-act play about this given situation, Beckett wrote a short, breathless one-act play, which does not seek to illustrate the subject, but simply presents it.

There is one line in Play where the Robert Stephens character says: 'pardon, no sense in this, oh, I know.' I feel that's Beckett responding to those critics and academics who are trying to analyse their own ideas about 'sense'.

I can no longer remember how George Devine fielded all the questions that were asked about Play. In any case, after we'd worked on the piece for about a week a new element was introduced. I walked into the rehearsal room one morning and found a man in a raincoat quietly sitting there: the author. His hair looked as though it had been crewcut by some back-street barber. He wore John Lennon-type glasses at the end of his nose. That made me notice his pale, pale blue eyes and his air of intense concentration.

Beckett said nothing. Sitting there in his straight-backed chair, he just listened to us. George would do all the talking at rehearsals: the two men seemed to have a perfect rapport going. Beckett did not talk to the actor directly, he seemed to have absolute faith in George. He also knew that George would listen to what he had to say - when there was something he wished to say.

From the beginning I had a sneaky feeling about where we had to get to with Play, which was to go very, very fast, almost incomprehensibly fast. I therefore wasn't interested in an analysis of the play or of the characters. I didn't seem to need explanations. I just wanted to get on with my bit.

At rehearsal, George gave notes; then Beckett would speak to us in turn in our dressing-rooms. He sat down at my dressing-table. This was my first private encounter with a man with whom I would work more than anyone else during the next twenty-five years. For about ten minutes he said absolutely nothing, he just pored over the script. I said nothing either. Had I asked him many questions, I don't think we would ever have been able to enter into the relationship we had. I soon realised Beckett was a most gentle person, a gentle man - kind, quiet and private.

Billie Whitelaw, Billie Whitelaw... Who He?
More at A Piece of Monologue:
14.2.10

Disjecta: This week's links

Minimalist movie poster for Ridley Scott's Blade Runner, by Jamie Bolton

Jamie Bolton's minimalist movie poster for Ridley Scott's Blade Runner

This week, American jazz and literary critic Stanley Crouch profiles the career of Ralph Ellison. Maud Newton publishes interviews with Patricia Highsmith. Don DeLillo speaks to NPR about his new book, Point Omega. And The Independent reviews a new art exhibition based on the work of J. G. Ballard. In addition to this week's literary news, academic conferences have been announced on Freud and Derrida, to be held later in the year. Proto-punk fans will be excited to hear that The Stooges' seminal Raw Power is to be re-released in a deluxe edition, including David Bowie's rarely heard original mix of the album. Fritz Lang's Metropolis has been re-cut with additional, previously unseen, scenes. And an online artist combines the world of Roland Barthes with Springfield's Bart Simpson.

Literature:

Ralph Ellison: Critic Stanley Crouch on the American writer's 'endless blues'
Jonathan Safran Foer: Featured on The Guardian's online book club
Thomas Bernhard: Varia bids happy birthday to the late Austrian author
Patricia Highsmith: Maud Newton on Highsmith, the artist and the habit of recording
Don DeLillo: NPR hosts audio interview with DeLillo on new book, Point Omega
J. G. Ballard: The Independent reviews new Ballardian art exhibition
William Faulkner: New York Times on the plantation diary that inspired Faulkner
Lydia Davis: The Guardian profiles American writer in a series on the short story
Wallace Stevens: Ryan Ruby on the quiet American poet
The Future of Reading: Josh Quittner's fascinating article on reading habits and future publishing
UK Library Borrowing: Top 250 books borrowed from UK libraries

Philosophy & Critical Theory:

Roland Barthes: Barthes by Barthes by Bart

Music:

Iggy Pop and the Stooges: Raw Power released as a deluxe edition with documentary and book

Film:

Fritz Lang: Dystopian science fiction masterpiece Metropolis, 'reborn' in Berlin
Minimalist Movie Posters: Kubrick, Scott, Spielberg, Lucas

Theatre:

Samuel Beckett: UbuWeb hosts David Warrilow's vocal performance of A Piece of Monologue

Etc.:

Tea: The Ink Quest targets the institution of the British cup of tea
Valentine's Day: Celebrate with a Mad Men Valentine card

Thank you to all link contributors, who can be found on the A Piece of Monologue Twitter page.
11.2.10

Pierre Chabert, 1939-2010

Beckett specialist and theatre-maker passes away
Samuel Beckett and Pierre Chabert

John Calder has written a tribute to 'French theatre-maker and Beckett specialist' Pierre Chabert, who passed away on 28 January:
Pierre Chabert, who has died of a cerebral haemorrhage aged 70, was one of France's leading actors in the intellectual theatre. He came to specialise in the work of both Samuel Beckett, with whom he collaborated for many years, and Robert Pinget.

In the mid-60s, Chabert was cast in Pinget's monologue L'Hypothèse (Hypothesis), in Paris. Pinget was primarily a novelist, who had started to write for the theatre and had little idea of stage direction, so he turned to his friend Beckett for advice. Beckett devised a precise staging for the production. Although he always knew (usually against the will of the director) exactly how he wanted things done, it was the first time that Beckett had directed. Chabert's article about the production has been widely reprinted over the years in many countries.

[...]

Among the other authors performed by Chabert were Pinget, Serge Rezvani, Raymond Cousse and Alain Didier-Weill. He took a particular interest in the German author Thomas Bernhard, and had recently adapted his novel, The Loser, about Glenn Gould, the Canadian pianist, for the stage.

[...]

Beckett cast Chabert in many of his own plays. He was particularly associated with Beckett's La Dernière Bande (Krapp's Last Tape). Beckett directed Chabert in the monologue in Paris in 1975. The actor performed the part all over the world. It was seen in London a few years ago at the Cockpit theatre. Chabert played many Beckett roles, most notably Hamm in Endgame in Paris in 1981, and was preparing a production of Happy Days when he died. [Read the article]